1. Comparison of average peak push forces required to advance Laser Sheath at 40 Hz vs. 80 Hz Pulse Repetition Rate through simulated fibrosis material at an advancement rate of 1.0 mm/s. D015722, Daten liegen Philips vor.
2. Comparison of ablation force vs. advancement rate of Laser sheath 40 Hz vs. 80 Hz by use of the data collected in D015786, Daten liegen Philips vor.
3. Maytin M, Epstein, L (2011). The challenges of transvenous lead extraction. Heart, 97(5):425-34.
4. Henrikson, C.A., et al. (2008). How to prevent, recognize, and manage complications of lead extraction. Part III: Procedural factors Heart Rhythm. Jul;5(7):1083-7. Epub 9. Okt. 2007.
5. Smith MC, Love CJ. Extraction of transvenous pacing and ICD leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008:31:736-52.
6. Wilkoff, B.L., et al. (1999). Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: Results of the Pacing Lead Extraction with Excimer Sheath (PLEXES) trial. JACC, 33(6), 1671-1676.
7. Reduced advancement force lowers the forces applied to leads during extraction, D015861-01, Daten liegen Philips vor.
8. Design Verification Report for Ablation Force Testing. D015722, Daten liegen Philips vor.
Die Produktverfügbarkeit unterliegt der behördlichen Zulassung im jeweiligen Land. Bei Fragen zur Verfügbarkeit in Ihrem Land wenden Sie sich bitte an Ihr Philips Vertriebsteam.
GlideLight wird von LifeSystems in Australien und Neuseeland vertrieben.